Employment-Based Immigration
Second Preference · Advanced Degree Professional
The EB-2 Advanced Degree pathway allows qualifying professionals to pursue U.S. permanent residence through employment when both the worker and the permanent position meet the advanced-degree standard. A beneficiary may qualify with a U.S. master's or higher degree, a qualifying foreign equivalent, or a bachelor's degree followed by at least five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience in the specialty. A master's degree alone is not enough: the offered position must also require an advanced degree or its regulatory equivalent. In the conventional employer-sponsored route, the process generally involves Department of Labor permanent labor certification, Form I-140, and then adjustment of status or consular processing when an immigrant visa number is available.
Classification
The EB-2 advanced-degree classification is an employment-based path to U.S. permanent residence for members of professions whose qualifying permanent position requires an advanced degree or its equivalent. It is part of the broader employment-based second-preference category, which also covers certain individuals of exceptional ability in the sciences, arts or business.
“EB-2A” is sometimes used informally to distinguish advanced-degree cases from other EB-2 filings. USCIS classifies these petitions under EB-2 for members of professions holding advanced degrees or their equivalents.
Academic credentials are only one part of the analysis. The permanent position must itself require an advanced-degree professional, and the beneficiary must meet the education and experience requirements of that job.
Eligibility
USCIS recognizes two principal ways to satisfy the advanced-degree requirement.
A U.S. master's, doctorate, qualifying professional degree above the bachelor's level, or a qualifying foreign equivalent may satisfy the advanced-degree requirement.
The permanent position must also require an advanced degree or qualifying equivalent.
A U.S. bachelor's degree or qualifying foreign equivalent degree plus at least five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience in the specialty may satisfy the regulatory equivalent.
The five years must follow the bachelor's degree and must be progressive in nature.
USCIS describes progressive experience as work experience of a progressing nature in the specialty. Five years in the workforce do not automatically satisfy the standard.
Increasing responsibility, greater technical complexity, deeper professional knowledge, supervisory duties or broader decision-making authority can help demonstrate progression.
The bachelor's-plus-five-years route requires a U.S. bachelor's degree or a foreign degree evaluated as equivalent to a U.S. bachelor's degree, followed by the required progressive experience.
A combination of education, professional training and work experience should not be assumed to satisfy the foreign-equivalent-degree requirement.
Evidence of experience: employer letters should provide enough detail for USCIS to evaluate the work actually performed, including dates of employment and relevant duties. A résumé may organize the employment history but ordinarily does not replace primary employment evidence when such documentation is required.
Position Requirements
The beneficiary's education does not determine the immigrant classification by itself. In a conventional labor-certification case, the permanent job must require a professional with an advanced degree or the regulatory equivalent.
For example, a software engineer may hold a master's degree in computer science. If the certified permanent position requires only a bachelor's degree and two years of experience, the beneficiary's master's degree does not automatically convert the position into an EB-2 advanced-degree job.
In a PERM-based case, USCIS generally examines whether the beneficiary possessed the required education and experience when the labor certification application was filed.
A qualification obtained later will not ordinarily establish that the beneficiary already met the certified requirements on the priority date.
If a labor certification requires a master's degree in a specified field, the immigrant petition must establish that the beneficiary possesses the required degree or an acceptable equivalent under the certified terms. When an employer permits an alternative combination of education and experience, that alternative must be stated clearly and remain consistent with the EB-2 classification requested.
Labor Certification
Most employer-sponsored EB-2 advanced-degree cases require permanent labor certification from the U.S. Department of Labor before the employer files Form I-140 with USCIS. This procedure is commonly known as PERM.
PERM is not the green card application itself. DOL uses the process to determine whether there are sufficient able, willing, qualified and available U.S. workers for the permanent position and whether employment of the foreign worker will adversely affect the wages and working conditions of similarly employed U.S. workers.
The employer identifies the duties, work location and actual minimum education, training and experience requirements.
The employer obtains a prevailing wage determination from DOL. The offered wage must satisfy the applicable wage requirements.
Professional positions generally require a state workforce agency job order, newspaper advertising and additional professional recruitment methods under 20 CFR 656.17.
After completing the required pre-filing steps, the employer files the Application for Permanent Employment Certification through DOL's FLAG system.
DOL may request supporting recruitment or business-necessity evidence. Employers must retain the records required by the PERM regulations.
After PERM certification, the employer moves to the USCIS immigrant-petition stage within the labor certification's validity period.
On the DOL processing-times page available in August 2026, the analyst-review queue was working on cases with July 2025 priority dates as of July 17, 2026.
DOL reported an average of 403 calendar days for analyst-review determinations completed in June 2026.
Schedule A Group I includes professional nurses and physical therapists. For these occupations, the employer generally submits the Schedule A labor-certification materials directly to USCIS with Form I-140.
Schedule A treatment does not itself establish EB-2 eligibility.
Immigrant Petition
After certification of a conventional PERM application, the sponsoring employer files Form I-140, Immigrant Petition for Alien Workers, with USCIS. USCIS independently determines whether the position, beneficiary and petitioning employer satisfy the requirements of the requested EB-2 classification.
USCIS may review federal tax returns, annual reports, audited financial statements, payroll records and evidence of wages already paid to the beneficiary.
The issue can require particular attention for smaller employers and companies sponsoring multiple workers.
An approved individual permanent labor certification is generally valid for 180 days.
The qualifying Form I-140 must be filed before the labor certification expires, subject to applicable filing rules.
An eligible E21 Form I-140 that does not request a National Interest Waiver currently has a 15-business-day premium-processing period.
An E21 National Interest Waiver petition has a separate 45-business-day premium-processing period.
Premium processing does not guarantee approval. USCIS must take qualifying adjudicative action within the applicable period. That action can include approval, denial, a Request for Evidence, a Notice of Intent to Deny or another qualifying action.
Visa Availability
EB-2 is subject to annual numerical limits. Approval of Form I-140 confirms USCIS approval of the immigrant petition, but it does not itself grant permanent residence or guarantee that an immigrant visa is immediately available.
The priority date is generally the date on which the Department of Labor accepted the permanent labor certification application for processing.
That date is compared with the employment-based cutoff dates published in the Department of State Visa Bulletin.
| Chargeability area | Final Action Date | Meaning in August 2026 |
|---|---|---|
| All chargeability areas except those listed | Current | No EB-2 Final Action cutoff date applies. |
| China — mainland born | September 1, 2021 | The priority date generally must be earlier than the listed cutoff for final action. |
| India | Unavailable | No EB-2 immigrant visa numbers are authorized for final action during the month. |
| Mexico | Current | No EB-2 Final Action cutoff date applies. |
| Philippines | Current | No EB-2 Final Action cutoff date applies. |
India is unavailable in the August 2026 EB-2 Final Action chart because the applicable fiscal-year limit was reached. An approved I-140 therefore does not permit final EB-2 immigrant visa action during that month.
For August 2026, USCIS directs employment-based adjustment applicants to use the Final Action Dates chart.
Visa Bulletin movement is not permanent. Cutoff dates can advance, remain unchanged, retrogress or become unavailable. A priority date that permits filing or final action in one month may have a different status in a later month.
Permanent Residence
After approval of the immigrant petition, permanent residence is completed through adjustment of status in the United States or immigrant visa processing abroad.
A beneficiary physically present in the United States may be able to file Form I-485 when the applicable Visa Bulletin and USCIS filing chart permit filing and the beneficiary satisfies the statutory adjustment requirements.
Manner of entry, maintenance of lawful status, unauthorized employment, statutory exceptions and grounds of inadmissibility can affect eligibility.
When a visa number is immediately available and filing requirements are satisfied, Form I-140 and Form I-485 may in some circumstances be filed concurrently.
A beneficiary completing the process abroad generally proceeds through the Department of State after approval of Form I-140.
The National Visa Center manages case preparation before the immigrant visa interview at the appropriate U.S. embassy or consulate.
Approval of Form I-140 does not guarantee visa issuance. The consular officer must independently determine visa eligibility and admissibility.
The principal employment-based immigrant's spouse and qualifying unmarried children may generally obtain derivative immigrant status when accompanying or following to join the principal beneficiary, subject to visa availability and applicable immigration requirements.
The Child Status Protection Act (CSPA) can preserve eligibility for some derivative children even after their chronological 21st birthday.
The outcome depends on the statutory CSPA calculation and other requirements, including the applicable “sought to acquire” rule.
Strategic Distinction
Advanced-degree eligibility and a National Interest Waiver address different legal requirements. The advanced-degree standard establishes one basis for qualifying for the underlying EB-2 preference category. A National Interest Waiver asks USCIS to waive the usual job-offer requirement and, consequently, the normal labor-certification requirement because granting the waiver would be in the national interest.
Permanent job offer: generally required.
PERM: generally required unless another applicable procedure, such as Schedule A, applies.
I-140 petitioner: normally the sponsoring employer.
Core analysis: the job, beneficiary, labor certification and employer must satisfy the applicable requirements.
Permanent job offer: may be waived.
PERM: normal labor-certification requirement is waived if NIW is granted.
I-140 petitioner: the beneficiary may self-petition.
Core analysis: underlying EB-2 eligibility plus the separate NIW framework.
A master's degree does not automatically establish NIW eligibility. The petitioner must first qualify for the underlying EB-2 category and then separately satisfy the requirements for the National Interest Waiver.
Case Preparation
The job description, prevailing wage request, recruitment record, labor certification, academic evidence, experience documentation and Form I-140 must remain factually and legally consistent.
Before recruitment begins, the employer's actual minimum requirements should support the requested EB-2 classification and the beneficiary should already possess the qualifications required by the position. The prevailing wage request, recruitment materials, ETA-9089 and Form I-140 should describe the permanent position and its requirements consistently.
FAQ
No. Advanced-degree professional is one basis for qualifying for the underlying EB-2 preference category. A National Interest Waiver is a separate request asking USCIS to waive the usual job-offer and labor-certification requirements.
Yes, but a bachelor's degree alone does not satisfy the advanced-degree equivalency route. A U.S. bachelor's degree or qualifying foreign equivalent followed by at least five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience may satisfy the standard.
No. The permanent position must require an advanced-degree professional or qualifying equivalent, and the beneficiary must satisfy the certified education and experience requirements.
The conventional advanced-degree route generally requires a permanent U.S. job offer and an employer-filed Form I-140. A National Interest Waiver can remove those requirements when its separate legal standard is satisfied.
An eligible E21 Form I-140 without NIW currently has a 15-business-day premium-processing period. E21 NIW petitions have a separate 45-business-day period. Premium processing guarantees qualifying adjudicative action, not approval.
No. The beneficiary must still have an immigrant visa number available and complete adjustment of status or immigrant visa processing before obtaining permanent residence.
Yes. EB-2 Final Action is current for most chargeability areas, Mexico and the Philippines. China-mainland born has a September 1, 2021 Final Action Date, while India is unavailable for the month.
In some employment-based cases, the Child Status Protection Act can preserve a derivative child's immigration age after the chronological 21st birthday, subject to the statutory CSPA calculation and other requirements.
Primary Authorities
Posted on Google![]()
Debby OtuonyeTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I had a good experience working with Arvian law firm on my O-1b visa case. The process was straightforward, communication was fast and easy, and Alona was always helpful and there to answer my questions. Thank you for your support and guidance!Posted on Google![]()
SonsTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Здравствуйте! Хочу от всей души поблагодарить команду Arvian Law Firm и Vitalii Maliuk за профессиональную помощь, благодаря которой мы смогли получить наши грин-карты по DV-2026! Как вы знаете, в этом году вокруг DV-2026 было очень много неопределённости: то паузы, то отмены, то новые ограничения. Мы консультировались с несколькими адвокатами, в том числе с теми, которых нам рекомендовали как самых дорогих и опытных. После консультаций с тремя адвокатами мы услышали одно и то же: шансов нет, подавать документы не стоит, во время паузы получить грин-карту не получится. Позже друзья порекомендовали нам команду Arvian Law Firm. Уже после первой консультации мы услышали совершенно другой ответ: всё реально, давайте начинать! Мы начали процесс в июле. Наш номер стал current в августе, а уже 31 июля все наши документы были поданы. Вся работа была выполнена на высочайшем профессиональном уровне. Особенно хочу отметить, насколько грамотно был подготовлен наш кейс и составлены все необходимые объяснения и обоснования, в том числе относительно того, почему мы решили пройти процесс изменения статуса внутри США, а не выезжать для прохождения консульского процесса. На собеседовании всё прошло настолько легко и спокойно, что первым вопросом, который нам задали, было: «Правильный ли у вас адрес, чтобы отправить грин-карты?» Никаких сложных вопросов, никаких проблем — интервью прошло очень легко. А уже на следующий день мы получили одобрение! Огромное спасибо Vitalii Maliuk и всей команде Arvian Law Firm за профессионализм, поддержку и проделанную работу!Posted on Google![]()
Bjorn FolsomTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Хочу выразить огромную благодарность адвокату Виталию Малюку за профессиональную помощь в моем иммиграционном деле! Мы выиграли иммиграционный суд по делу об убежище.На протяжении всего процесса Виталий проявлял высокий профессионализм, внимательно относился ко всем деталям дела, грамотно готовил меня к суду и всегда был на связи. Иммиграционный процесс был очень волнительным, но благодаря его знаниям, опыту и уверенной работе я знал что наше дело находится в надёжных руках. Искренне благодарен Виталию за проделанную работу и положительный результат. Однозначно рекомендую его как грамотного, ответственного и профессионального иммиграционного адвоката!Posted on Google![]()
Vlad FisherTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I would like to leave a positive review for attorney Vitalii Maliuk and the team at Arvian Law Firm. They worked professionally and competently, explained everything clearly and in simple terms. They responded in a timely manner without unnecessary pressure or excessive questions. In the end, we won the case, and the cost of services was reasonable. Overall, I am satisfied with the cooperation and can recommend them.Posted on Google![]()
Rustem IslamovTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Добрый день. Хочу сказать спасибо адвокату Виталию и всей команде Arvian group. Мы вместе смогли выиграть моё иммиграционное дело. Обратился за помощью для решения моей проблемы и помощью в юридических тонкостей в сша. Моё дело было не простое, было много тонкостей и мелких деталей, но очень важных. плюс сложности с текущей действующей политикой администрации и статистикой судьи в 7% одобрения. Адвокат и его команда проявили глубочайшие знания американского иммиграционного законодательства, всегда были на связи и четко контролировали каждый этап подготовки документов. Благодаря их стратегии и вниманию к деталям, наше дело было разобрано на детали, предложены варианты решения острых тем . У нас был план и я понимал происходящие процессы. Для работы над моим делом был создан отдельный чат, где я мог оперативно задавать любые вопросы и получать развернутые консультации. Особенно ценными стали видеозвонки перед судебным слушанием , адвокат помог детально подготовиться, благодаря чему в суде я чувствовал себя уверенно и мы достигли полного взаимопонимания . Я абсолютно доволен сделанным выбором. Ещё раз огромное спасибо Виталию и всей команде Arvian Group за их колоссальный труд, поддержку и этот счастливый положительный результат в моей жизни! Вы — лучшие в своём деле!
If you are located in the US, please feel free to contact us with any questions or concerns you may have. We look forward to helping you.
Complete the relevant questionnaire for a preliminary EB-2 / EB-3 case evaluation.
Arvian Law Firm LLC
Vitalii Maliuk,
ATTORNEY AT LAW (МО № 73573)
Copyright © Arvian Law Firm LLC 2026
