OUR IMMIGRATION SERVICESFamily-based immigration to the USA

Q: How does CSPA matter when a child will soon turn 21?

The Child Status Protection Act may protect eligibility in some cases. In some family categories, a child’s age is calculated under special rules, but the result depends on the category, filing date, visa availability date, and timely next steps.

Author: Attorney Vitaly Malyuk. License: MO No. 73573

Family Immigration to the United States: Categories, Timelines, Priority Dates, and Filing Strategy

Family immigration remains one of the main lawful paths to a U.S. green card, but eligibility depends on more than proving a family relationship. The process starts with the sponsor’s status: U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident. From there, the case must be placed in the correct category: an immediate relative of a U.S. citizen, where an immigrant visa number is usually available right away, or a family preference category, where the waiting time depends on the priority date and the current Visa Bulletin. Form I-130 establishes the qualifying relationship, but it does not grant permanent residence by itself. After approval, the applicant continues through consular processing with the Department of State or, if eligible and lawfully present in the United States, through adjustment of status with USCIS. In 2026, a strong filing strategy must account for both the Visa Bulletin and USCIS monthly instructions on which chart applies to Form I-485. Errors in category selection, timing, or procedure can cause delays, denials, and lost time, especially once the priority date becomes current.

BOOK A CONSULTATION

Family Immigration to the United States: What It Means and How to Get a Green Card Through Family

Family immigration to the United States is a path to permanent residence and a green card through a qualifying family relationship. In this process, a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident files an immigrant petition for a relative. The case is not based on a general intention to relocate a relative to the United States, but on a legally recognized relationship: a spouse, parent, child, adult son or daughter, brother, or sister in categories allowed by immigration law. The central legal distinction is clear: not every relative can be sponsored, and not every sponsor has the same immigration options.

Overview: family immigration to the United States starts with identifying the sponsor’s status, the relative’s category, and the correct processing path: consular processing outside the United States or adjustment of status inside the country. Immediate relatives of U.S. citizens usually do not wait for an annual quota, while family preference categories depend on the priority date, the Visa Bulletin, and the availability of an immigrant visa number.

At the immigration-planning level, family cases fall into two broad groups: Immediate Relative and Family Preference. The first group is for the closest relatives of U.S. citizens and is not subject to an annual numerical cap. The second group is limited by quotas, so applicants wait until an immigrant visa number becomes available under the Visa Bulletin. This difference explains why two family cases that look similar on the surface may move at very different speeds: a spouse of a U.S. citizen often moves faster than a brother or sister of a U.S. citizen, while a spouse of a permanent resident depends on the F2A category and current bulletin dates. F2A may move faster than other family preference categories in some periods, but it still depends on the Visa Bulletin and can move, pause, or retrogress.

Process sequence: the sponsor’s status is identified first, followed by the relative’s category and the filing path — an immigrant visa through consular processing outside the United States or adjustment of status inside the United States.

Family Immigration Categories in the United States: Who Can Sponsor Whom

A U.S. citizen may file a petition for a spouse, child, parent, son or daughter, and brother or sister. For a parent or brother/sister petition, the U.S. citizen sponsor must be at least 21 years old. But there are important differences inside that list. A spouse, an unmarried child under 21, and a parent of a U.S. citizen who is at least 21 fall into the Immediate Relative group. These categories are not subject to the Visa Bulletin queue in the usual sense because they do not have an annual numerical limit. However, the absence of a quota does not mean automatic approval: USCIS still reviews the reality of the family relationship, inadmissibility grounds, entry history, documents, and the good-faith nature of the marriage when the case is based on a spouse. Even with an approved I-130, the applicant may still face issues such as unlawful presence, misrepresentation, certain criminal history, prior removal orders, immigration fraud findings, or public charge analysis.

A U.S. permanent resident has a narrower set of options: an LPR may sponsor a spouse and unmarried children. A permanent resident cannot file a family immigration petition for parents, brothers, sisters, or married children. For many families, this becomes a strategic factor: the sponsor’s naturalization can change the case category, but it can also affect the queue and the age analysis for a child. In some F2B cases, automatic conversion to F1 after naturalization may not be the best outcome, so the opt-out rules should be reviewed before assuming that a new category is automatically better. For that reason, family immigration cannot be evaluated by looking only at Form I-130; category movement, family status, visa availability, and future eligibility changes all affect the case.

Category	Sponsor	Who It Covers	Queue
Immediate Relative	U.S. citizen	Spouse, child under 21, parent of a U.S. citizen age 21+	No annual limit
F1	U.S. citizen	Unmarried sons and daughters age 21+	Yes, under the Visa Bulletin
F2A	Permanent resident	Spouses and children of permanent residents	Yes; may move faster than other preference categories, but still depends on the Visa Bulletin
F2B	Permanent resident	Unmarried sons and daughters age 21+	Yes, often lengthy
F3 / F4	U.S. citizen	F3 — married sons/daughters; F4 — brothers/sisters of U.S. citizens age 21+	Yes, often many years

A crucial point: family immigration is not the same as a visitor visa, an informal “invitation,” or a right to come to the United States and wait inside the country without status. Form I-130 establishes the qualifying relationship, but by itself it does not give the beneficiary immigration status, work authorization, or a right to live in the United States. For an Immediate Relative who is already in the United States and meets the requirements, concurrent filing of I-130 and I-485 is often possible. For family preference categories, this is possible only when an immigrant visa number is available and in line with the filing chart USCIS allows for that month.

The U.S. Family Immigration Process: From I-130 to a Green Card

The standard process begins with Form I-130, Petition for Alien Relative. Its purpose is to prove that the sponsor and beneficiary have a qualifying family relationship. In marriage cases, this means more than a marriage certificate: the record should show the reality of the relationship through shared residence, financial documents, children, correspondence, photos, travel history, insurance, bills, and other evidence. USCIS also reviews whether the marriage was legally valid where it took place, whether both spouses were free to marry, and whether the marriage was not entered into to evade immigration laws. In parent, child, sibling, and sister/brother cases, the foundation usually includes birth certificates, name-change records, adoption documents, divorce records, or remarriage records when they affect the legal family chain.

1

Check the category and the sponsor’s eligibility.

The first step is to determine whether the sponsor is a U.S. citizen or permanent resident and which family relationship is allowed by law.

2

File Form I-130 with USCIS.

The petition confirms the family relationship. Errors in the category, dates, names, or choice of consular versus domestic processing can cause delays.

3

Wait for approval and immigrant visa availability.

For Immediate Relatives, the main issue is readiness for the next step. For Family Preference cases, the priority date must also be tracked.

4

NVC and consular processing or I-485 inside the United States.

Outside the United States, the case usually goes through the National Visa Center and a consulate. Inside the United States, adjustment of status may be possible if the applicant qualifies.

5

Final checks, interview, and decision.

Officers review documents, biographical history, admissibility, financial support, and the absence of grounds for denial.

In consular processing, after I-130 approval the case is transferred to the National Visa Center, where the applicant pays fees, submits the DS-260 immigrant visa application, and uploads civil documents and the sponsor’s financial forms. The case is then scheduled for an interview at a U.S. embassy or consulate. Inside the United States, the path is different: when an immigrant visa number is available and the applicant meets the requirements, the applicant may file I-485 for adjustment of status. Immediate relatives of U.S. citizens often file I-130 and I-485 together if they are already in the United States and are eligible for adjustment of status. In preference categories, the priority date, Visa Bulletin, and the monthly USCIS filing chart must be checked first. The choice between consular processing and I-485 can materially affect timing, travel risk, work authorization, advance parole, and lawful presence issues. A history of unlawful presence, unauthorized work, misrepresentation, prior removal, or criminal history may require a waiver or may make adjustment of status unavailable.

Family Immigration to the United States and the Visa Bulletin in 2026: How to Read the Queues

For family preference categories, the Visa Bulletin is the central planning tool. The priority date usually corresponds to the date the I-130 petition was filed. If a category is oversubscribed, the applicant waits until the priority date is earlier than the date published in the relevant chart. The Visa Bulletin uses two concepts: Final Action Dates show when an immigrant visa or green card may be finally issued; Dates for Filing show when documents may be submitted if the responsible agency allows that chart.

In the May 2026 Visa Bulletin, the State Department lists the family-sponsored preference limit for fiscal year 2026 as 226,000 and confirms that family-sponsored and employment preference visas are distributed by petition filing date and subject to country-based limits. In practice, this means that even an approved I-130 in F1, F2B, F3, or F4 does not immediately become a green card if an immigrant visa number is not yet available.

Category	Final Action, all countries*	Dates for Filing, all countries*	Practical Meaning
F1	01SEP17	01OCT18	The queue for adult unmarried children of U.S. citizens remains many years long.
F2A	01AUG24	Current	Spouses and children of residents may have a more active window to prepare documents.
F2B	22MAY17	01JAN18	Adult unmarried children of residents must carefully track the priority date.
F3	15FEB12	08DEC12	Married children of U.S. citizens often face a long queue.
F4	15SEP08	01SEP09	Brothers and sisters of U.S. citizens usually need to plan years ahead.

*Data is shown for “All Chargeability Areas Except Those Listed” in the May 2026 Visa Bulletin. Dates may differ for Mexico, the Philippines, India, and China-mainland born applicants. Chargeability is usually based on the beneficiary’s country of birth, not citizenship or current passport; special cross-chargeability rules may apply in some family situations.

Chart: Relative Waiting Time by Family Preference Category

F2A — spouses and children of permanent residents

lower

F1 / F2B — adult unmarried children

medium

F3 — married children of U.S. citizens

higher

F4 — brothers and sisters of U.S. citizens

longest

The chart shows comparative waiting length based on published cut-off dates and is not an individual prediction for any specific case.

Family Immigration to the United States: Case Review Factors and Common Filing Issues

In 2025–2026, vetting has become especially important in family immigration cases. USCIS and consulates evaluate not only the existence of a marriage or birth certificate, but also the overall credibility of the story. In marriage cases, officers review whether the marriage is bona fide: whether the family was created genuinely and not to evade immigration law. In child and parent cases, age, legal parentage, prior marriages, adoptions, and the accuracy of documents from the country of origin matter. In preference cases, the current family status is also critical: for example, the marriage of an adult son or daughter can change the category and, in some cases, eliminate eligibility if the sponsor is a permanent resident.

Treating I-130 as the Full Green Card Process

I-130 proves the relationship, but it does not complete immigration. After approval, the case may still require NVC processing, DS-260, an interview, a medical exam, I-864 financial sponsorship, and waiting for an immigrant visa number. Inside the United States, I-485 eligibility must also be analyzed.

Priority Date Not Tracked

In preference categories, the priority date determines the applicant’s place in line. If the date is not yet current, even a perfectly prepared case cannot be finally approved as an immigrant visa or adjustment of status.

Insufficient Marriage Evidence

For spousal petitions, a formal marriage certificate is not enough. A strong file shows shared life, financial ties, a real relationship history, and consistent answers at the interview.

Family Changes Not Reflected

Divorce, marriage, the birth of a child, the sponsor’s naturalization, the sponsor’s death, or a child turning 21 can change the legal picture. These events can affect the category, derivative eligibility, and timing of the next filing step.

Child Age and CSPA Not Analyzed

The Child Status Protection Act (CSPA) is important in family cases. A child’s immigration age is not always the same as the ordinary calendar age: in some cases, it is calculated under a special formula that considers visa availability and the time I-130 was pending. For this reason, a child turning 21 is analyzed under the applicable CSPA rules rather than by calendar age alone.

Processing Path Not Matched to Eligibility

Consular processing and adjustment of status inside the United States have different requirements, timelines, and risks. This choice can affect I-485 eligibility, work authorization, advance parole, travel risk, and the overall structure of the case.

Inadmissibility Issues Not Addressed

An approved I-130 does not erase problems such as unlawful presence, misrepresentation, certain criminal history, prior removal orders, immigration fraud findings, or public charge concerns. These issues can affect the immigrant visa interview, I-485 filing, waiver analysis, and final decision.

Naturalization Effects Not Compared

A sponsor’s naturalization can move a beneficiary from F2B to F1. In some situations, especially where F2B is moving better than F1, the opt-out rules may affect the preferred category analysis.

Case Structure: Family Green Card, I-130, I-485, and Consular Processing

A U.S. family immigration case starts with a precise map: who the sponsor is, who the beneficiary is, which category applies, where the applicant is located, whether the entry into the United States was lawful, whether there are status violations, whether adjustment of status is available, which priority date applies, and which chart is used in the current month. Then the documentary record is built. For spouses, this does not mean “many photos,” but a balanced showing of real family life. For parents and children, it means a clean chain of civil records. For brothers and sisters, it means proof of a common parent or parents and all legal changes of names or marriages.

The affidavit of support — Form I-864 — is a central part of many family immigration cases. It is not just proof of income; it is a legally binding contract between the sponsor and the U.S. government. The government evaluates whether the applicant can receive sufficient financial support and whether the applicant is likely to become a public charge in the applicable legal sense. If the main sponsor’s income is not enough, a joint sponsor may be required. That role is not a formality: the joint sponsor accepts an independent legal obligation that may last for years after the green card is issued.

Case Type	Main Evidence	Common Risk	Documentation Focus
Spouse of a U.S. citizen	Marriage, shared life, finances, relationship history	Suspicion of a sham marriage	Timeline, joint documents, consistent answers
Parent of a U.S. citizen	Birth, child’s citizenship, sponsor age 21+	Document gaps or name changes	Civil records and explanation of changes
F2A spouse of a resident	Marriage, LPR status, Visa Bulletin	Queue and date changes	Bulletin monitoring and document readiness
F4 brother/sister	Common parent, certificate chain	Very long wait	Sponsor age 21+, family planning, and derivative beneficiaries

FAQ: Family Immigration to the United States, I-130, the Visa Bulletin, and a Green Card Through Family

Is family immigration to the United States available for any relative?

No. U.S. law limits which relatives can be sponsored. A U.S. citizen has a broader list, including parents and brothers or sisters. A permanent resident may sponsor a spouse and unmarried children.

Does I-130 approval give the right to live in the United States?

No. An approved I-130 confirms the family relationship, but it does not by itself provide status, work authorization, or the right to remain in the United States. A green card requires the next stage: consular processing or adjustment of status.

Why are a spouse of a U.S. citizen and a spouse of a resident processed differently?

A spouse of a U.S. citizen is an Immediate Relative and does not wait for an annual quota. A spouse of a permanent resident usually falls under F2A, where the Visa Bulletin and immigrant visa number availability rules apply. F2A may move faster than other family preference categories in some periods, but it is still controlled by bulletin movement and visa number availability.

Which is more important: the I-130 approval date or the priority date?

In preference categories, the priority date is the key reference point — usually the date the petition was filed. I-130 approval is necessary, but it does not eliminate the queue.

Can family immigration be expedited?

Preparation can reduce avoidable delays: the correct category, complete documents, consistent information, and timely responses all matter. Annual limits in preference categories cannot be bypassed without a lawful basis.

What is concurrent filing of I-130 and I-485?

It is the simultaneous filing of the I-130 family petition and the I-485 application for adjustment of status. This filing pattern most often applies to immediate relatives of U.S. citizens when the applicant is in the United States and qualifies. In preference categories, concurrent filing depends on immigrant visa availability and the current USCIS chart for filing I-485.

How does CSPA matter when a child will soon turn 21?

CSPA may protect eligibility in some cases instead of relying only on calendar age. In some family categories, a child’s age is calculated under special rules, but the result depends on the category, filing date, visa availability date, and timely next steps after an immigrant visa number becomes available.

Can a sponsor’s naturalization change a family case?

Yes. Naturalization can move a case into a different category, such as from F2A to Immediate Relative or from F2B to F1. This may help in some cases, but it does not automatically improve every case. For some F2B beneficiaries, the opt-out rules may matter if F2B is more favorable than F1.

Can an approved I-130 still lead to a denial later?

Yes. I-130 approval confirms the family relationship, but the applicant must still be admissible. Issues such as unlawful presence, misrepresentation, certain criminal history, prior removal, immigration fraud findings, or public charge concerns can affect the final immigrant visa or adjustment of status decision.

Official Sources on Family Immigration to the United States

U.S. Department of State — Family Immigration The Department of State’s core page on family immigration. It explains the consular path, the role of immigrant visas, and the general structure of family reunification outside the United States.
USCIS — Form I-130, Petition for Alien Relative The official USCIS page for Form I-130. It is used to verify the purpose of the petition, current requirements, fees, instructions, and the fact that I-130 confirms a family relationship but does not automatically issue a green card.
USCIS — Green Card for Immediate Relatives of U.S. Citizen A source on immediate relatives of U.S. citizens: spouses, unmarried children under 21, and parents of a U.S. citizen. It helps distinguish Immediate Relative cases from categories with annual numerical limits.
USCIS — Green Card for Family Preference Immigrants The USCIS page for family preference immigrants. It is important for understanding F1, F2A, F2B, F3, and F4, the queues, immigrant visa number availability, and limits for permanent resident sponsors.
USCIS — Visa Availability and Priority Dates Explains priority dates and visa availability. This source is useful for verifying why an approved I-130 in a preference category does not always mean immediate eligibility for an immigrant visa or I-485 filing.
USCIS — Adjustment of Status Filing Charts from the Visa Bulletin The monthly USCIS page for applicants inside the United States. It shows which Visa Bulletin chart may be used to file I-485: Final Action Dates or Dates for Filing.
USCIS — Form I-864, Affidavit of Support Under Section 213A of the INA The official source on financial sponsorship. It confirms that I-864 is not just proof of income, but a legally significant support obligation.
USCIS Policy Manual — Child Status Protection Act The Policy Manual chapter on CSPA. It is used to analyze situations where a child turns 21 and it is important to determine whether age-based eligibility may be preserved for immigration purposes.
USCIS Policy Manual — Eligibility Requirements for Adjustment of Status Explains core adjustment of status eligibility concepts, including inspection and admission or parole, visa availability, and admissibility review. It supports the article’s point that I-485 eligibility must be checked separately from I-130 approval.
USCIS Policy Manual — Inapplicability of Bars to Adjustment Useful for understanding why some immediate relative cases are treated differently from preference-category cases when adjustment bars, status violations, or unauthorized employment are involved.
U.S. Department of State — Visa Bulletin May 2026 The primary source for May 2026 cut-off dates. It supports the table with Final Action Dates, Dates for Filing, the family-sponsored preference limit, and chargeability differences by country.

Testimonials about our services

      
   Arvian Law Firm LLC
   130 Google reviews 
  Write a review 
  
 
 
   
 
 
       Posted on Google  
   
   Alina Matiukhina 
 
 
 
 Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Спасибо Arvian Law Firm за помощь в получении грин карты по EB1a. Подавалась с ними и i140 петицию (получила одобрение) и 485 форму. Адвокат проконсультировал по поводу интервью по 485 форме, какие могут быть вопросы и мы получили одобрение и свои грин карты!
  
 
      Posted on Google  
   
   Aida Kolbasina 
 
 
 
 Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Мы хотим от всей нашей семьи выразить огромную благодарность нашему адвокату Виталию Малюку и всей его команде. Наверное, ни одна семья не может заранее подготовиться к тому, что ей придется в один момент оставить свой дом и начать жизнь заново в другой стране. Когда мы приехали в США, мы искали не просто адвоката, а человека, который честно оценит наш кейс и будет готов бороться за нас, не предлагая придумывать или добавлять то, чего на самом деле не было. До встречи с Виталием Малюком мы общались с несколькими юристами, и некоторые из них советовали изменить или дополнить нашу историю. Но на первой же встрече Виталий честно сказал нам: «У вас не самый простой и не самый сильный кейс. Но я верю, что он заслуживает того, чтобы за него бороться, и я готов это делать». Именно тогда мы поняли, что нашли своего адвоката. Отдельно хочется отметить, что Виталий Малюк и вся его команда сами родом из Украины, а мы — семья из России. Несмотря на это, они с первой минуты отнеслись к нам с уважением, пониманием и без каких-либо предубеждений. Они сразу взялись помогать нам, потому что для них были важны правда, закон и человеческое отношение. Это дало нам понять, что все наши старания, наша честность и наша позиция были не напрасны. Мы еще раз убедились, что находимся на правильной стороне и что есть люди, которые готовы поддержать тех, кто действительно нуждается в помощи, независимо от того, из какой страны он приехал. На протяжении всего процесса мы чувствовали огромную поддержку не только со стороны Виталия Малюка, но и всей его команды. Отдельные слова благодарности хочется сказать его помощнице Кристине. Она всегда была на связи, терпеливо отвечала на наши вопросы, помогала разобраться в каждом этапе процесса и никогда не оставляла нас без внимания. Такое отношение придавало нам уверенности и спокойствия в очень непростое для нашей семьи время. Мы ни разу не пожалели, что доверили вам наше дело. Более того, мы уже рекомендовали вас многим своим друзьям и знакомым, и знаем, что вы помогаете им с таким же профессионализмом, вниманием и искренним желанием добиться справедливости. От всей души желаем Виталию Малюку, Кристине и всей вашей команде крепкого здоровья, благополучия, профессиональных успехов и всего самого доброго. Спасибо за вашу честность, человечность и огромный труд. Мы никогда не забудем вашу помощь. С глубоким уважением и огромной благодарностью, Семья Колбасиных.
  
 
      Posted on Google  
   
   Masha Grygorian 
 
 
 
 Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Хочу поблагодарить Виталия и его команду от всей души. Мы выиграли кейс на политическое убежище на этапе интервью USCIS. Когда начинали процесс, мы даже подумать не могли, что это возможно! Но оказалось, что если вложить душу в этот процесс, работая с человеком, который знает свое дело - чудеса случаются! И даже в самые сложные иммиграционные времена. Также хочу отменить, что весь процесс от подачи заявления до получения одобрения занял 8 месяцев. Я знаю, что это скорее удача, нежели тенденция, но этим я хочу еще больше подчеркнуть, какую радость мы испытываем от этого события. И вдобавок скажу, что пока другие адвокаты поголовно твердили, что у украинцев нет оснований для прошения убежища, команда Виталия не только взялась за наше дело, а еще и собрала железный кейс. Рекомендую Виталия всем, кто хочет знать, что за его спиной стоит действительно адвокат-профессионал из Американских фильмов :) особенно рекомендую обращаться украинцам: в команде Arvian Group много людей, которые знают специфику вопроса, а это очень важно. Благодарим за исполнение нашей самой заветной мечты 🇺🇸 Желаем Виталию и всей его команде дальнейших успехов, процветания и множества побед!
  
 
      Posted on Google  
   
   Vitalii Kalugin 
 
 
 
 Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Всем здравствуйте! Не реклама, а реально честный отзыв о команде «Arvian Law Firm LLC». Наша история. Семья приехала 2 апреля 2022г. Через мексиканскую границу. Получили гум.пароль. Затем перешли на TPS. Я приехал (прилетел в Нью Йорк) в марте 2023 года по U4U. Затем подался на TPS. Почти год ждал разрешительных документов, чтобы в законном порядке выехать из Украины. Ввиду того, что реально некуда возвращаться, решили на законных основаниях остаться в США. Обращались ко многим адвокатам. Оплачивали за консультации. Ушло реально много денег на порой совершенно пустые разговоры, как говорится ни о чем. Помнится ждали апоймента на консультацию с одной очень известной адвокатшей (имени не буду говорить, ибо не буду делать ей антирекламу). И какое же было разочарование, что, уплатив 450 долларов, мы не получили ничего. Ну совсем ничего. Порой казалось, что я знаю больше, чем она. Она просто (прошу прощения за высказывание) ну просто «распедаливала» нас на еще не один десяток долларов. Я, сидя там понимал, что меня «разводят» на деньги и нагло врут. Потом было еще с пять- восемь (точно уже и не помню) так называемых консультаций. За это время, изучил не мало сам законов и правил. И вот когда уже совсем потеряли надежду, обратились за консультацией к Arvian Law Firm LLC. Честно говоря, я уже был практически уверен, что будет очередной развод на деньги, без каких-либо гарантий. Понятно, что гарантий никто не может дать, тем более в это время. НО! Каково было мое удивление, когда я консультировался с Максимом. Как-то сразу и, по существу, начался КОНКРЕТНЫЙ разговор. Я почувствовал, что мы понимаем с полу слова друг друга. Я объяснил, что мне надо абсолютно законный путь легализации. Что-то придумывать, врать и т.д. не хотелось. Не та страна, все станет явным, даже спустя многих лет. Поэтому, проанализировав все законы и шансы, я твердо был убежден, что я подхожу под визу L1A. Да, это не иммиграционная виза, да она на прямую не ведет к грин карте. Но L-1A открывает прямой путь к петиции EB-1C, а та уже может привести к постоянному виду на жительство. Как говорится есть нюанс). Так же я не понимал, что все адвокаты говорят про одни и те же пути легализации. А некоторых порой спрашивал про эту визу, так они вообще ничего не могли ответить, и я понимал, что они по моему мнению, даже не знают о чем я спрашиваю. Так вот. Я точно понимал, что по всем параметрам и законам я подхожу под эту визу. И Максим мне много чего подсказал, в плане какие документы надо собрать, какие нужны, а какие бесполезны. Далее я консультировался с Кристиной. Очень грамотная и конкретная барышня. Даже не смотря, что я с ней, можно сказать поспорил, мы все равно сделали все правильно. Да, было трудно. Порой невыносимо собрать то, что у нас в стране вообще не учитывается, а тут, это важно. Но путем консультаций, переговоров, переписок и т.д., я получил-таки визу. И через неделю пришли документы и моей семье. Огромная Благодарность Алене! Всегда отвечала на все мои письма. Всегда, по существу, были ответы. Кристина консультировала и даже уже не по нашему делу. За что отдельная Благодарность. Если бы Максим тогда, как говорится не зацепил меня своей простотой и откровенностью, то я точно бы не обращался бы ни к кому. Да, забыл сказать. Мы подали все документы. Оплатили за ускоренное рассмотрение дела и нам пришло уведомление о намерении отказать (Notice of Intent to Deny). Я вообще был в шоке. Ну как так-то!? Все документы в наличии. Ничего не придумано, все честно и все отвечает правилам. Но группа адвокатов нас не оставила и поддержала. Нам дали ограниченное время на доказательства. И мы успели собрать еще документы. Так же, когда я прочитал, в какой форме был ответ от адвокатов, офицеру, то, честно говоря, немного даже насторожило, но мне понравилось. Никто не просил офицера, а можно сказать «утыкал носом» офицера, что тот не умеет считать сроки, и у нас все вовремя. Мне понравилась форма ответа. Да, немного дерзко (это ну очень понравилось!) и по фактам. И нам пришло одобрение. Еще раз Благодарю ВСЮ команду Arvian Law Firm LLC! С Уважением!
  
 
      Posted on Google  
   
   Katia Makaro 
 
 
 
 Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Arvian Law is an excellent choice for anyone who needs help with immigration. The team is very professional, patient, and clearly experienced – they explain every step of the process in simple language and always respond quickly to questions. They show real care for their clients, prepare cases thoroughly, and fight for the best possible result, which gives a lot of confidence during a very stressful time.
  
 
      Posted on Google  
   
   Denis Akulov 
 
 
 
 Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Хотим поблагодарить команду за сопровождение нашего дела по категории EB-1 extraordinary ability. Работа велась профессионально: грамотная структура кейса, внимание к деталям и стабильная коммуникация на протяжении всего процесса. Команда хорошо разбирается в иммиграционном законодательстве и умеет правильно представить профессиональный опыт клиента. В итоге мы получили одобрение, и это главный результат. Рекомендуем как компетентную команду для дел по сложным иммиграционным категориям.
  
 
      Posted on Google  
   
   Максим Долгов 
 
 
 
 Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Хочу выразить искреннюю благодарность Arvian Law Firm за помощь в подготовке и подаче документов на визу талантов EB-1. Работа была выполнена профессионально и качественно. Все документы были подготовлены грамотно, и в результате моя петиция была успешно подана и одобрена. Спасибо за проделанную работу, внимательное отношение и профессиональный подход. Могу смело рекомендовать Arvian Law Firm тем, кто рассматривает подачу на визу EB-1.
  
 
      Posted on Google  
   
   Andrii Lutskan 
 
 
 
 Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Это лучшие профессионалы с которыми нам когда либо приходилось сотрудничать! Сегодня поучил approve по EB1a и до сих пор не могу поверить ! Если с кем и идти на результат то только с ними ❤️